Thursday, December 26, 2024

Review: Merbeings tries for a new take on a legend

Merbeings: The True Story of Mermaids, Mermen, and Lizardfolk

by Mark A. Hall, Loren Coleman, David Goudsward

Anomalist Books, 2023, 200 pp.

The three contributors, each with their own talents, have produced an uneven book, a mix of speculation, interesting stories, and puzzling errors. The late Mr. Hall was an exceptional researcher, Coleman is a prodigious cryptozoological writer and a friend, and Goudsward wrote a very good book on creature tales from Florida. I understand the challenge of trying to mesh the work of three people (most of it by Hall) into a cohesive whole, but I expected a better book.

The book starts with the hypothesis there is a global species of aquatic primate behind the merbeing stories.  Most of the stories of merpeople, as well as some hard-to-classify animal reports and even “Lizardmen,” refer to some variety of this species. It’s fair to mention that the late Mr. Hall liked to throw out provocative hypotheses, and I wasn't always sure how strongly he believed in them, but this is what we have to work with. If we suspend disbelief and read with an open mind, the book is entertaining but far from persuasive.

The authors did their research. The book is filled with interesting stories, with sources given in the chapter notes. Another good point is that Indigenous sources are, whenever possible, referred to by tribe or group names, vs the still-too-common “the Indians around Lake Powell say…” approach of lazy writers. The writers wisely avoid tying their idea too closely to the aquatic ape theory proposed by Hardy and expanded on by Morgan: they mention it just enough to make it a possible source of support without being dragged down by its universal rejection. Finally, they make a worthy effort to collect information from all over the world, avoiding being hemmed in by relatively recent Western motifs.  Missteps include stating the existence of many land primates (meaning sasquatch, yeti, etc.) all over the world as given despite the nonexistence of hard evidence for any of them and Hall’s championing of Homo gardarensis, a long-discarded species based on an acromegalic H. sapiens skull.

The supporting accounts are spread all over the world, decades or centuries apart, often describing creatures quite differently. The authors suggest there is only one species of marine primate, likely a descendant of the swamp-liking fossil ape Oreopithecus. The differences are due to its using ornaments and coverings (including tails) from other mammals and fish to improve mobility, provide insulation, or express cultural norms. It’s an imaginative solution, and would be fun for fiction, but without evidence, it’s much easier to conclude the differences indicate unrelated mistakes, folklore, and hoaxes. (At one point it is mentioned there might be two species, one genuinely tailed.)

Tales from fishermen, Indigenous Americans, Western explorers, and other sources are used, and the hypothesis requires we accept all of them as true and basically accurate – even the ones about lizardmen jumping on to the running boards of cars. There is not a whit of evidence besides stories. The worst choice of an incident to mention concerns huge yellow humanoids (nowhere near water) in Vietnam. The source account in Martin Caiden’s book Natural or Supernatural? says American troops blasted the creatures at short range with automatic weapons without harming them, meaning the story is necessarily a hoax.

The authors never try to condense the accounts into a single description of the species: size, diet, current range and the reason for it, reproduction, etc. Nor is there an illustration of such. The book holds that scientists haven’t discovered the living animal because they are closed-minded about it and have not collected fossils in the likely places (land once covered by shallow water), because they weren't looking for them. In any fossil dig, though, everything is collected and examined, and there have been many digs of such sites. One might suggest the species was always too rare to have turned up yet, but if so, it wouldn’t have the necessary worldwide distribution of viable populations. Hall addresses this by citing a crackpot theory of crustal displacement, which doesn’t help any.  

I don’t think any authors could have made a successful book out of this: the speculation is just too much of a reach, the evidence too thin and scattered to support it. Some of the individual accounts and legends are intriguing, and those plus the references make the book worth having for cryptozoologists, but the boat the authors try hard to build just doesn’t float.   

Matt Bille is a writer, historian, and naturalist living in Colorado Springs. He can be reached at mattsciwriter@protonmail.com. Website: www.mattbilleauthor.com.

Read Matt's Latest book, Of Books and Beasts: A Cryptozoologist's Library. This unique reference offers a friendly skeptic's 400 reviews of books on cryptozoology, zoology, related sciences, and cryptozoological fiction.