Experts divided on super-booster
The SLS is the only major space transportation project NASA has going (industry has others of course, but people pay more attention to a NASA program, especially if it supports human space flight.) NASA management is bullish on it, but other experts wonder if it's the best approach. A lot of people, myself included, are afraid the very expensive project may be starved of funds and end up getting canceled. Five-flight Shuttle astronaut Scott Parazynski, says, "I worry about this one, in particular, because there's really not a destination with milestones. When you have a rocket, but you don't really know where it's going to take you yet, that becomes discretionary funding that's easily canceled. And that's what I think is going to happen."
Does the President have us on a workable course for human exploration, or would one of the GOP candidates be better? By workable, I don't just mean they would fund good ideas, but would they let the engineers do the work without political interference and constant budget changes? NASA has staked a lot on this big bird.
1 comment:
The SLS is mandated by congress so, just as the Space Shuttle, it will happen no matter what...until they cancel it. The SpaceX rockets offer a cheaper better way to do the actual work but due to jobs and votes congress wants SLS to happen..41 Billion and not launching the heavy lift version until 2030..very sad.
Post a Comment