The beaked whales are fascinating enough to make cetologists drool. Not only are they distinctive in themselves, and sometimes weird, like the strap-toothed whales, they seem to be innumerable. In October 2021, scientists announced the finding of the 23d species (depending how you count: there are some questions here) of this enigmatic group. This Southern Hemisphere cetacean, one of many species identified from stranded specimens, was christened Ramari's beaked whale, Mesoplodon eueu,
A 19th-century vision of a beaked whale
The newest discovery complements a long list of 21st century surprises and appearances.
Until 2002, the
Indopacific beaked whale (Mesoplodon pacificus or Indopacetus pacificus) was known only from two skulls washed
ashore thousands of miles and 73
years apart. Dr. Lyall Watson, in his Sea Guide to Whales of the World, suggested a large pod of beaked
whales photographed near Christmas Island might belong to this species, which
is also called Longman’s beaked whale. He made the same suggestion concerning
brown whales reported in the Gulf of Aden by Captain Willem F. J. Morzer-Bruyuns, although that witness was
certain he was seeing an unknown type of killer whale. Numerous other possible
sightings of Longman’s beaked whale, such as a report of two unidentified
grayish whales seen near the Seychelles in 1980, were recorded, but no one was
certain which ones –if any – referred to this enigma of the seas.
All that changed in
2002. An odd beaked whale beached on
July 26 in Japan, but no one thought much of it initially. The carcass was photographed, then buried. When a cetologist saw the pictures, he
scrambled to get the thing disinterred as quickly as possible. It was the first example of Longman’s beaked
whale ever recovered intact. In an odd
coincidence, a second specimen identified as I. pacificus drifted ashore in South Africa the following month,
although Japanese experts questioned this identification. (Two old South African specimens, which had
been identified as other species, were then re-examined and were reported to be
Longman’s whale as well. By now you should be getting an inkling of how complex distinguishing beaked whales in.) Until this
point, cetologists knew nothing of the animal’s appearance (it’s predominantly
grayish brown, with the head often appearing darker and sporting some small
white side markings) and were unsure of the size (about twenty feet).
The smallest
beaked whale is the Peruvian, or Lesser, beaked whale. Scientists had no inkling of its existence until
1976, when Dr. James Mead found its decaying skull on a beach in Peru. By the time Mead formally published his
description of Mesoplodon peruvianus
in 1991, Peruvian scientists and fishermen had helped him assemble a total of
eleven specimens. All were found either
washed up on shore or trapped in fishing nets.
The adult
Peruvian beaked whale is normally about eleven feet long. It is mainly dark gray, with a paler gray
underside. It has a small dorsal fin set
well back on the body. While all known
mesoplodonts have such dorsal fins, there are differences in shape which help
distinguish the different species. In
some beaked whales, like the Peruvian, the fin is a near-perfect equilateral
triangle with a straight trailing edge.
In others, such as True’s beaked whale (M. mirus), the trailing edge is concave, so the fin is more falcate
or sickle-shaped.
It turned out
this whale has a wider distribution than originally thought. Other specimens have since been found
stranded in Mexico near Baja California and on the island of Espiritu Santo in
the eastern tropical Pacific. There are still few recorded observations of the
living animal, although pods of two or three have been seen.
In 1995, four
cetologists published the results of their study of a single calvarium (the portion of the skull housing the brain) found on the beach of Robinson Crusoe Island off Chile in 1986. Julio Reyes and his colleagues proclaimed
they had identified another new species of beaked whale. Bahamonde’s beaked whale (Mesoplodon bahamondi) was distinguished
principally by an unusually short and broad rostrum (snout).
The discoverers
suggested Bahamonde’s whale could represent the mysterious Mesoplodon “Species A,” an unidentified beaked whale reported and
photographed in the Eastern Tropical Pacific region. The overall length of M. bahamondi is estimated at sixteen to eighteen feet, which is an approximate match to these
sightings. British paleobiologist Darren
Naish, who makes a specialty of studying unusual cetaceans, cautioned that, “Glimpses of the head of
Species A do not reveal the very abrupt rostrum that seems to be diagnostic for
M. bahamondi, so they are probably
not the same.”
As things turned
out, Naish was right. Bahamonde’s beaked
whale was not Species A – but it was identical to another mystery species. In a paper published in 2002, a group of
cetologists demonstrated that M.
bahamondi, while a valid species, was a resurrection of a species described
in 1874 but generally forgotten. Mesoplodon traversii was restored to its
rightful place in the genus after 128 years, while M. bahamondi was reduced, in taxonomic parlance, to the status of a
junior synonym. This does not diminish
the importance of the work by Reyes and company. It’s significant any time a genuine new whale
goes into the books – whether it’s brand new or just a case of science saying
hello to a long-forgotten discovery.
The beaked whales
still had some surprises in store for science.
One of the peculiarities of this group of cetaceans is that, while
experts like Dr. Merel Dalebout of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia
estimate they have been reproductively separated for perhaps three million
years, their morphology hasn’t changed nearly as much as their genetics. It’s common for genetic change to lead
morphological change, resulting in species that are distinct but still look
similar, but the beaked whales have taken this principle to an extreme. Not only do many of the twenty-one known species look similar in life, requiring
an expert to distinguish them, but even when an animal is beached it can be
mistaken for another species.
That was the case with
Perrin’s beaked whale, Mesoplodon perrini. There have been many sightings of beaked
whales which puzzled observers. For
example, Dr. Karin Forney of the Southwest Fisheries Science Center spotted one
off the coast of Oregon in 1996. The
animal was brownish-gray and bore some resemblance to Hector’s beaked whale (M. hectori.) However, some important details failed to
match up. Most adult male beaked whales
have two or more teeth in the lower jaw, which in many species are erupted
(that is, are visible even when the jaw is closed.) The shape and placement of these teeth is a
major criterion for classifying these enigmatic cetaceans. In Forney’s whale, the visible teeth were not
close to the beak tip as is normal in M.
hectori.
As it turned out, the
similarity to M. hectori was
significant. Between 1975 and 1997, four beaked whales stranded on the coast of
California were initially identified as Hector's beaked whales. Dr. Dalebout and her associates, in
surveying DNA samples from numerous mesoplodonts, found these four didn’t fit
well with M. hectori. Neither did a fifth California specimen,
which had been identified as Cuvier’s beaked whale. In 2002, Dalebout, along with four of her
colleagues, published the discovery of Mesoplodon
perrini. When Karin Forney saw the
description, she knew what she had observed in 1996. It was indeed, at the time she’d seen it, an
undescribed whale.
In 2016, A new species of whale was discovered based on a body, 7.3m long, that floated ashore on the Pribilof Islands. This is just marvelous. I follow news of new and unidentified whales all the time, and I never heard a word about this, although it's apparently known to Japanese fishers, so it has a range that spreads far west. Indeed, Japanese scientists were already investigating the reports. This isn't a case where someone had it in hand and decided that its features or DNA warranted a split of a known species, as was the case with Balaenoptera omurai in 2003. This species was confirmed by DNA work, which resulted in reordering of its genus, but it began with a brand-new discovery from the field, when a biology teacher called in a seal researcher he knew who said, "This is weird," and then she called in a cetologist. Other previously collected (misidentified) skeletons have been located.
Here's the published abstract from Marine Mammal Science:
Philip A. Morin, et. al.
There are two recognized species in the genus Berardius, Baird's and Arnoux's beaked whales. In Japan, whalers have traditionally recognized two forms of Baird's beaked whales, the common “slate-gray” form and a smaller, rare “black” form. Previous comparison of mtDNA control region sequences from three black specimens to gray specimens around Japan indicated that the two forms comprise different stocks and potentially different species. We have expanded sampling to include control region haplotypes of 178 Baird's beaked whales from across their range in the North Pacific. We identified five additional specimens of the black form from the Aleutian Islands and Bering Sea, for a total of eight “black” specimens. The divergence between mtDNA haplotypes of the black and gray forms of Baird's beaked whale was greater than their divergence from the congeneric Arnoux's beaked whale found in the Southern Ocean, and similar to that observed among other congeneric beaked whale species. Taken together, genetic evidence from specimens in Japan and across the North Pacific, combined with evidence of smaller adult body size, indicate presence of an unnamed species of Berardius in the North Pacific. It was named in this paper.
Readers of this blog know of Dr. Robert Pitman, who's done so much work with orcas and beaked whales. Of this find, he said, "It boggles my mind to think that a large, very different-looking whale has gone unnoticed by the scientific community for so long. It sends a clear message about how little we know about what is in the ocean around us."
It does indeed.
What is still out there? Well, there are these odd vocalizations from the Antarctic. There's this apparent species, still being investigated. Who knows what else?
1 comment:
That is cool. Honestly while I have my doubts how many of the classic sea monster sightings are off a particular unknown species, there is no doubt that the sea is the one place some legitimately monstrous critters still lurk unknown.
Post a Comment