I’m doing a
project I call “A Cryptozoologist’s Library” (ACL). The idea was to pull all my book reviews over
the last 30 years and collect and publish those I think taught me the most
about cryptozoology, It has, of course, gotten more complicated, but I should
say what I’m NOT trying to do is establish a best-books canon. Doing that right could take a couple of
years. Getting something people can use
in 2020 means they’re getting the view of someone who’s been reading the topic
for 45 years. My intent is to put out a
low-cost e-book anyone interested in cryptozoology can afford.
Why just books?
Books are important in any field, but they have a special importance in
cryptozoology. Magazines, newspapers, letters, etc. are ephemeral, and despite
the huge efforts made by people like Loren Coleman, much is lost to us. Books
have survived. They’ve been written and carried all over the world. One other proven means of sharing information
is scientific journals, but cryptozoological work is rarely submitted and very
rarely passes muster, while cryptozoological journals have struggled. So books are the backbone of cryptozoology’s
body of shared knowledge. Many of the books in ACL are available as e-books,
but I’m a traditionalist, and every book here is available (new or used) as a
physical book I’ve had in my possession.
My focus is physical,
scientific cryptozoology. I don’t discount parapsychological phenomena out of
hand, but this is my project and to me, “If it’s not zoology, it’s not
cryptozoology.” If cryptozoology is ever
going to prove the existence of mystery animals in a way that gets them (the
animals) proper protection and adds to human knowledge, it has to be by scientific
methods and results.
Having said
that, what is cryptozoology?
Having read
many definitions, this is mine.
Cryptozoology
is a scientific endeavor that uses the methods of zoology (investigation,
archival research, talking to indigenous/local people about animals, etc.) to
search for new and presumed-extinct animals, but broadens the aperture to consider
cases where the evidence has not been strong enough, or the circumstances (habitat,
etc.) favorable enough, to draw significant attention from most zoologists.
The draft of
ACL has already climbed past 220 entries.
To keep it from getting out of hand, I’ve set a limit of 200, and I
think it will look like this: 130 books about, or mainly about, cryptozoology, 35
books from my related science reading (paleontology, zoology, etc.), 20-25
novels, and 10 slots for oddities. I include novels because they, too, have
special importance in cryptozoology. Not only can good novels get people
thinking about the unknown creatures of the world, they provide a means for
scientifically-minded authors to work out the details of how, say, Ogopogo
might eat, reproduce, stay hidden, etc.
(That rules out the horror novelists who go straight to the teeth and claws,
however fun they may be.)
The numbers
mean some books already reviewed will be deleted. I have orders out for only about
four more that might be added. Thanks to
everyone for the recommendations of all sorts.
I’m mentioning this project publicly so I have to follow through: I’m
bad about that. There may also be a book
sale when I’m done, as I’ve read a lot more books than I can shelve.
As I said, it’s
not a canonical list (that would be a huge project that would require some
level of return, while the ACL book is planned to be affordable).
Despite
starting this as a low-input endeavor to suggest books I’ve found valuable;
it’s grown a little more complex. To
wit:
1.
I have to decide where to draw a draw a fuzzy
line about how much paranormal content rules out a book that provides
worthwhile information on physical cryptozoology. For example, Healey and Cropper’s Out of
the Shadows: Mystery Animals of Australia has one chapter on apparitions,
but the rest is good: it definitely qualifies.
2.
Where do some books go? A book on the Tasmanian
tiger would normally fall in Science, but as cryptozoologists still seek it, I
put a couple that seemed to fit in the cryptozoology section.
3.
The Science section is the only one where I
thought, “I should have one book on A and at least one on B.” Since there are 30-35 slots, I’ve focused on
books that seem useful to cryptozoological pursuits, meaning vertebrates get
most of the space (the cephalopods being an exception). Books won’t make anyone a field expert, and
I’m not one myself, so the focus here is on foundational science vs. how to
build a sasquatch trap or take witness statements. Examples making the cut so far include: A
New Human, by Morwood and van Oosterzee; Evolution, by Carl Zimmer; The
Lost Species, by Christopher Kemp; and World Ocean Census, by Crist,
et. al.)
So, I’m progressing. I’m pondering looking for someone who already
understands e-books to work with: it will take a little longer if I actually
have to learn a business, I should have learned a decade ago.
Onwards!
1 comment:
Sounds like a good idea.
Post a Comment