I have the new CollectA Dunkleosteus terrelli, and it’s marvelous.
First, disclosure: CollectA sent me one to review. They must
have thought I’d like it, and I do. It became
my favorite model Dunk the minute I took it out of the box. It bears notice
that the company is making the Dunk a centerpiece: it’s on the covers of the
catalogs they included and even on a tote bag.
It’s the biggest of the commercial models, except for that odd
Chinese foam knockoff of the Schleich dunk, and it’s hefty and solid. The jaw
moves, and the anatomical details, even the speculative ones, all look right.
I thought from early photos there was sort of a hump on the
back, but “in person,” the model looks much more streamlined. CollectA’s Peter
Leung explained, “The hump (which isn't supposed to be anything of the sort) is
simply the result of having the bony skull embedded in the body of the
Dunkleosteus, rather than to just have it resting on the surface of the fish
like a suit of armour as other firms have done.” In that respect it’s a bit like the much
smaller Safari Dunk, the most streamlined of the bunch. The head shape, too, is more streamlined, not
as blocky as in some models, and the effect is of a powerful but hydrodynamically
efficient predator. The sclerotic rings are in the eye sockets, not protruding.
The joints in the armor are visible, but don’t have much effect on water flow.
The fins are rounded, and they too look right, as does the asymmetrical tail
with a large lower lobe. (It may not be correct, as there was a recent paper arguing for a sharklike tail, but it LOOKS right as a natural part of the creature.) There are lines
of bumps I originally took for scutes, but Leung wrote to me, "As the
skull is the only thing preserved in the fossil record the rest of the animal
is pure speculation as any artist or modeller has to do. No one for instance is
certain on how the tail may have looked.
One has to look at contemporary and modern species and also think what
will make the model attractive both visually and touch-wise. The skin
ornamentations are not scutes but I based them on the skin of the Devonian
fossil fish Gemuendina and other skin decoration on those of large modern
fishes such as the Wolf Fish.”
In my estimation, this is about as good as a model can get
without seeing the real thing. Comparing it to my other Dunks, this one is not quite
as terrifying as Jeff Johnson’s fierce-looking resin kit and not as weird as
the Schleich dunk. It’s a little more rounded than the shark-tailed Favorite
model (whose artist we know also did a lot of research) and has much, MUCH more
surface detail than any other vinyl model.
Speculation and all, this is an
amazing job.
Thanx for the post.
ReplyDeleteTechnical Education Essay
That is a cool model
ReplyDelete